NDH.com

icon


Wolters Kluwer | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
News Capsules
orange bar


   Web Toolkit

   Drug Updates

   Patient Teaching

   News Capsules

   Drug Warnings

   Herbal Spotlight

   Drug Info and
   Nursing Links


   CE Tests

   Career Opportunities

   Drug Info Bookstore

   Feedback

   Registration

   Disclaimer



Ideal INR

For patients with mechanical heart valves, atrial fibrillation, or myocardial infarction (MI), oral anticoagulant therapy helps to prevent thromboembolism. However, anticoagulant use also increases the risk of bleeding. That's why Dutch researchers undertook a study of more than 4,000 patients to determine the ideal International Normalized Ratio (INR) at which the risks of thromboembolism and bleeding were lowest.
   Over the 4-year course of the study, the researchers logged the incidence and intensity of adverse events during anticoagulation therapy. Such adverse events occurred roughly 4% per year for all indications. From these data, the researchers calculated the optimal INR to minimize such events, which can improve the safety of oral anticoagulant therapy. For patients with mechanical heart valves, the optimal INR was 2.5 to 2.9. For patients with atrial fibrillation, it was 3.0 to 3.4. For patients who had had an MI, it was 3.5 to 3.9.
   The authors of the study suggested that, for future clinical trials, researchers use a 3.0 INR target for patients with mechanical valves or atrial fibrillation and 3.5 for post-MI patients. (Archives of Internal Medicine, 2009, 169[13]: 1203-1209)


     
   

Home - Guest Registry - Customer Service

Brought to you by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
For help on how you should use this site, see our
Disclaimer .

© Copyright 2010 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins